You Have IO Access. Can You Trust the Blood Sample?

Dr. Abdolghader Pakniyat

You Have IO Access. Can You Trust the Blood Sample?

An ED shift story | EM Mastery Academy

It’s a busy night in the ED.

A 55-year-old patient arrives confused, hypotensive, and poorly perfused. His BP is 75/40 mmHg.

The team struggles to obtain IV access. After failed attempts, you place an intraosseous (IO) line.

Good. Now you have access for emergency treatment.

Before flushing the line, the nurse manages to aspirate a small amount of bone marrow blood.

She asks:

“Doctor, can we send this for blood tests?”

A simple question. But would you trust all the results?

What should we remember?

IO aspirates can provide useful information, particularly for selected tests such as pH, chloride, urea, and creatinine.

But there are important limitations.

Which IO blood tests can we trust?

Laboratory testReliabilityPractical interpretation
Sodium, chloride, bicarbonateGood correlationUseful preliminary results
Urea, creatinine, bilirubinGood correlationUseful preliminary results
pHGood correlationMay help assess acidosis
HemoglobinGenerally correlatesConfirm if critical
GlucoseVariableConfirm important values
PotassiumUnreliableMay be falsely elevated
WBC, platelets, hematocritUnreliableDo not substitute for a peripheral CBC
PCO₂, PO₂UnreliableDo not substitute for a blood gas
AST, ALT, ALPUnreliableConfirm with venous blood
LactateInsufficient evidence in shockAvoid relying on isolated IO lactate
ABO/Rh typingPotentially reliableRequires blood-bank acceptance

These findings primarily concern initial bone marrow aspirates before flushing or infusion. Correlation does not establish interchangeability in every critically ill patient or on every laboratory analyser.

And there is another problem: bone marrow particles may interfere with laboratory analysers. Not every laboratory accepts IO samples.

A practical habit for your next shift

If an IO sample is needed, collect the initial aspirate before flushing or administering medications, when feasible.

Check which tests your laboratory accepts, clearly label the sample as intraosseous, and confirm important results using venous or arterial blood as soon as possible.

Meanwhile, don’t delay resuscitation while waiting for laboratory confirmation.

The IO line is there to help you treat the patient. It does not guarantee that every laboratory result is reliable.

One question worth remembering:

Before trusting an unexpected laboratory result, do you know where the blood came from?

Recognize early. Act early. Reassess often.


References

  1. Tintinalli’s Emergency Medicine, 9th ed. Chapter 114, Table 114-2: IO Laboratory Findings Compared With Phlebotomy.
  2. Roberts and Hedges’ Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine and Acute Care, 7th ed. Chapter 25: Intraosseous Infusion.
  3. Infusion Nurses Society. Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 9th edition. 2024.
  4. Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne. Intraosseous Access Clinical Practice Guideline. Updated December 2024.
  5. Jousi M, et al. Analysing blood from intraosseous access: a systematic review. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019.

Author

  • Dr. Abdolghader Pakniyat, emergency medicine specialist and EM Mastery Academy founder

    Dr. Abdolghader Pakniyat is an Emergency Medicine Specialist, clinical educator, and founder of EM Mastery Academy. He holds European Board certification in Emergency Medicine and RDMS (Abdomen) certification. His work connects resuscitation, point-of-care ultrasound, and clinical reasoning through practical, case-based education for frontline clinicians.

Discover more from EM Mastery Academy

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading