What Would You Do? 02: The Heart Rate That Didn’t Fit

Empty hospital bed beside vital-sign monitor and medical equipment
Dr. Abdolghader Pakniyat

What Would You Do? 02: The Heart Rate That Didn’t Fit

WHAT WOULD YOU DO? · CASE 02

The case

During a crowded ED shift, a woman arrived from a family medicine clinic after about a week of cough and breathlessness. She was sitting comfortably, using her phone. Her lungs were clear and she had no fever. SpO₂ was 97–98% on room air, BP 110/70 mmHg, and HR 120/min. The ECG showed sinus tachycardia. There was no recent surgery or long-distance flight.

The clue

Focused bedside echo suggested a right ventricle larger than the left. The tachycardia remained unexplained.

What would you do next?

Which is the most appropriate immediate approach?

  1. Observe and repeat vital signs; investigate PE only if hypoxaemia or hypotension develops.
  2. Repeat cardiac POCUS to confirm RV enlargement before beginning a PE investigation.
  3. Assess PE probability and promptly follow the indicated D-dimer or CTPA pathway.
Reveal the answer and reasoning

C — Investigate according to clinical probability now. If PE is likely, arrange urgent CTPA; if unlikely, use an appropriate D-dimer pathway. Normal oxygen saturation does not exclude PE.

RV enlargement can have other causes and can be misjudged on an off-axis view. It cannot confirm PE, and a normal limited echo would not exclude it. Waiting for desaturation (A) or repeating POCUS before initiating the diagnostic pathway (B) risks delay.

What happened? CTPA was requested, but approval was delayed. After discussing the concern with the patient, enoxaparin was given while awaiting imaging. About three hours later, CTPA confirmed bilateral pulmonary embolism. If PE is clinically likely and imaging is delayed, interim therapeutic anticoagulation may be appropriate after assessing bleeding risk and contraindications.

Reassess heart rate, blood pressure, breathing and perfusion; escalate promptly with clinical deterioration.

Bedside takeaway: A normal SpO₂ does not explain away persistent, unexplained tachycardia.

A simple habit for the next shift

When a patient looks well but something doesn’t fit, I try to ask myself three questions:

How sick is this patient, beyond the numbers?

What dangerous diagnosis could I be missing?

And which direction is the patient moving?

If I’m concerned, I also want a clear plan for reassessment, investigation, and escalation.

This doesn’t mean ordering more tests for everyone. It means not dismissing an abnormal finding simply because the rest of the picture looks reassuring.

In a crowded ED, we all feel the pressure to make decisions quickly.

But sometimes, the most important decision is recognizing that a patient who looks fine still needs a closer look.

Recognize early. Act early. Reassess often.

Sources

  1. NICE NG158 — Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis and management.
  2. 2026 AHA/ACC Multisociety Guideline for Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Related: Suspected pulmonary embolism — a practical ED diagnostic algorithm →

Educational case for healthcare professionals; apply clinical judgment and local pathways.

Explore previous challenges →

Author

  • Dr. Abdolghader Pakniyat, emergency medicine specialist and EM Mastery Academy founder

    Dr. Abdolghader Pakniyat is an Emergency Medicine Specialist, clinical educator, and founder of EM Mastery Academy. He holds European Board certification in Emergency Medicine and RDMS (Abdomen) certification. His work connects resuscitation, point-of-care ultrasound, and clinical reasoning through practical, case-based education for frontline clinicians.

Discover more from EM Mastery Academy

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading